Nathan

All Quiet on the Western Front Get Off the Fence Debate
 * **YES** ||  **War Should Be Avoided At All Cost**  ||  **NO**  ||
 * **Source 1: Pro-War Sentiments**


 * -The author was in the Korean War and has a firsthand view of war**


 * -Only wanted the war to defend South Korea, not to go on the offensive**
 * -http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/9/20/131629.shtml** ||  || **Source 1: The Anti-War Movement in the United States**
 * -Mainly an anti-war movement because of the Vietnam War**

= -The war was to eliminate terrorists = = -Led to a regime change in Iraq = -http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/politics/domestic_politics/iraq%2Binquiry%2Bin%2Bsearch%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bprowar%2Bvoices/3463747.html || ||  Source 2: The Rise and Fall of the Anti-Vietnam War Movement in the U.S.   -This article shows how the anti-war movement begun and what happened to the movement when the war in Vietnam ended.
 * -People disrespected the military because of their beliefs on war**
 * -http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/vietnam/antiwar.html** ||
 * = Source 2: Iraq inquiry: in search of the pro-war voice =

- http://chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/Vietnam/riseandfall.html || I think that War should be avoided, but not at all costs. I say not at all costs, because if you were to put the statement “avoid war at all costs” then after Pearl Harbor happened, what would we have done boycotted Japan? That doesn’t seem right, if someone was to kill thousands of Americans and cost the U.S. millions of dollars, then war should definitely take place. I think war should be avoided, unless you are attacked and only defending the people of your country, not an offensive.